Filthy words and the case of pacifica foundation

Federal Communications Commn. v. Pacifica Foundation

Nevertheless, we analyze them separately. The First Amendment does not prohibit all governmental regulation that depends on the content of speech.

IVpermitting householders to require that mail advertisers stop sending them lewd or offensive materials and remove their names from mailing lists. I do not think Carlin, consistently with the First Amendment, could be punished for delivering the same monologue to a live audience composed of adults who, knowing what to expect, chose to attend his performance.

Justice Murphy when he said: Unfortunately, the facial appeal of this justification for radio censorship masks its constitutional insufficiency. Laurent Scharff, Corydon B.

A satiric humorist named George Carlin recorded a minute monologue entitled "Filthy Words" before a live audience in a California theater. Anything that could be sold at a newsstand for private examination could be publicly displayed on television.

In that case, Mr. Heh, he had a shit-fit. Jacksonville, supra, at ; Cohen v. Additionally, Pacifica noted that before the broadcast aired, a warning message was issued noting that the broadcast might contain material that was offensive to some people.

Municipal Court, U. At work you can say it like crazy. Nonetheless, when he left the courtroom, Cohen was arrested, convicted of disturbing the peace, and sentenced to 30 days in prison.


White ; 68 Cong. Words that are commonplace in one setting are shocking in another. Hamling rejected a vagueness attack onwhich forbids the mailing of "obscene, lewd, lascivious, indecent, filthy or vile" material.

FCC v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978)

The Commission refused to renew the license, citing the nature of the broadcasts. The reasons for these distinctions are complex, but two have relevance to the present case.

Douglas was living in Long Island, working for CBS, and, on the side, a dedicated defender of decency. The Court of Appeals had invalidated the regulations because their vagueness might lead to self-censorship of controversial program [ U.

We have thoughts, but thoughts are fluid. Although these words ordinarily lack literary, political, or scientific value, they are not entirely outside the protection of the First Amendment. Pacifica Foundation, U.

The language involved in this case is as potentially degrading and harmful to children as representations of many erotic acts.

Brief for Petitionerand n.The monologue included “words you couldn’t say on the public airwaves,” and proceeded to repeat those words over and over again in a variety of colloquialisms.

A New York radio station owned by Pacifica Foundation (Pacifica) (plaintiff) broadcasted the “Filthy Words” monologue. Full case name: Federal Communications Commission v.

Pacifica Foundation, et al. Citations: U.S. The F.C.C. was justified in concluding that Carlin's "Filthy Words" broadcast, though not obscene, was indecent, and subject to restriction. Court membership; Chief JusticeMajority: Stevens, joined by Burger, Blackmun, Rehnquist, Powell.

When George Carlin recorded an expletive-laden minute monologue before a live audience in a California theatre, Obscenity Case Files: FCC v. Pacifica Foundation John Douglas wrote that he tuned to WBAI while in his car and heard the Filthy Words routine.

Seven dirty words

He called the monologue “garbage,” and mentioned that his “young son. This case requires that we decide whether the Federal Communications Commission has any power to regulate a radio broadcast that is indecent but not obscene. October 30,a New York radio station, owned by respondent Pacifica Foundation, broadcast the "Filthy Words" monologue.

A few weeks later a man, who stated that he had heard the. Syllabus. A radio station of respondent Pacifica Foundation (hereinafter respondent) made an afternoon broadcast of a satiric monologue, entitled "Filthy Words," which listed and repeated a variety of colloquial uses of "words you couldn't say on the public airwaves.".

The following is a verbatim transcript of "Filthy Words" (the George Carlin monologue at issue in the Supreme Court case of FCC fresh-air-purifiers.comca Foundation) prepared by the Federal Communications Commission. Aruba-du, ruba-tu, ruba-tu.

Filthy words and the case of pacifica foundation
Rated 4/5 based on 20 review